Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ryan Ismert's avatar

Thanks Kathryn and Jimmy - this has been on my mind a lot recently. A couple of random questions that I find myself pondering:

- "Superior AI systems will eventually come for your business"... if "good enough" AI systems haven't already. If a company has already adopted basic AI tools (e.g. via AI assistants embedded in their existing SCM, ERP, CRM, etc software) is there enough opportunity left to make this a good investment? Alternately, is it a good signal that the acquisition is a good cultural fit for further AI transformation.

- How will investors and AI vendors compete to capture value at these acquisitions? Presumably, the rolled-up company paying for an AI to reduce cost or scale various business functions will be a more effective use of capital for than (e.g.) ramping hiring for the foreseeable future, but might you get a better return by just investing in the AI vendor? Related: thediff.co has great posts on the theme of "software and private equity competing to eat the world", with some entries on roll-ups like Bowlero and SW providers like ServiceTitan.

- More generally, I wonder if the execution risk is worth it for investors not already executing on an operational improvement model. This (Verdad piece)[https://verdadcap.com/archive/private-equity-operational-improvements] and this (Tidal Wave piece)[https://newsletter.tidalwaveresearch.com/p/private-equitys-sbc-opportunity] suggest that in general, claims of margin expansion from operational improvements should be taken with a grain of salt. Admittedly, this may not apply as well to industry roll-ups, but maybe it should encourage some conservativeness in investors' assumptions.

I don't mean to sound skeptical - I'm actually very excited about the use of AI in this space, for everything from deal sourcing to decision making to scaling sales and operations. Exciting times!

Expand full comment

No posts